tomcat version works on win XP. There were few trivial issues with the console, for which I have opened Jira.
Thanks Anita --- Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Looks pretty good to me on Win XP with both tomcat > and jetty (aside from > the problem with the links to confluence that Dave C > already mentioned > which we should be able to fix without a rebuild). > +1 > > Joe > > Matt Hogstrom wrote: > > The feedback on the candidate from yesterday was > positive and most of > > the folks reporting issues on the previous release > have commented back > > and indicated that those problems have been > addressed. The most > > significant issue being the race condition fixed > by Dain as well as some > > console issues raised by other folks. Thanks to > all for their quick > > turnaround of problems and comments. > > > > Today on e-mail and IRC there was discussion about > three additional > > issues that were asked to be considered for the > final release. They were: > > > > Correct a script for Windows to reduce the > verbosity of the startup. > > (GERONIMO-1385) > > > > Fix a problem with Tomcat Clustering GBean (I > think Jeff is opening a > > JIRA for this one) > > > > Security issue where the user requested secure > pages but they were not > > being honored by the server and potentially left > them insecure > > (GERONIMO-1384). > > > > After talking with Aaron, Jeff and John about the > impacts I decided to > > apply their fixes to the 1.0 branch to build and > test them. My > > rationale was as follows (-1's on my thinking > welcome...we'll not > > really...but I'll accept them): > > > > - We indicated that clustering would be available > in 1.0. We knew there > > was an issue and Jeff had the fix in hand. Given > that we had to re-run > > CTS and this fix was simple and localized I felt > that it was important > > enough for the project to be included. > > > > - The security error was significant in that the > user had no warning > > that a requested feature would not be honored. > The fix provided by > > Aaron effectively detected the condition at > deployment and aborted with > > an error message telling the user what was wrong > and to take corrective > > action. A better fix is planned but was beyond > the scope of 1.0 so this > > stop-gap is sufficient for 1.0. > > > > - The verbose batch script on Windows was > providing a lot of extra and > > unnecessary information and since that is the > user's first impression I > > felt it was important enough to address for 1.0 > and included that as well. > > > > That said, as release manager I am officially > declaring the release > > closed barring TCK failures or any other serious > issues. Serious in my > > mind means corrupted data or intolerable outcomes. > > > > That said, the new build is available at > > http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/geronimo-1.0 > and the file names are: > > > > geronimo-jetty-j2ee-1.0-20051219.zip > > geronimo-jetty-j2ee-1.0-20051219.tar.gz > > geronimo-jetty-tomcat-1.0-20051219.zip > > geronimo-jetty-tomcat-1.0-20051219.tar.gz > > > > Please take time to review the builds and provide > your feedback. As > > noted above, barring a catastrophe this will be > the release that will go > > out as 1.0. There are many additional features > and fixes we want to get > > into the release but we also need to get a release > to our users. > > Assuming the TCK passes and there is no negative > feedback then we'll > > start a vote for the release. TCK testing was > started around 0300 EST > > on 12/19. > > > > It is very important to take the 30 minutes needed > to download and test > > the server. Please take that precious time sooner > than later :) > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > -- > Joe Bohn > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep, to > gain what he cannot > lose." -- Jim Elliot > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
