Rajith Attapattu wrote:

I came across the same problem when trying to implement POP3 version of the Message. For now I relied on the Sun impl of the MimeMessage and it did have problems of parsing the headers properly especially the InternetAddress. So is Rick going to work on this and have our own MimeMessage impl ???

We're going to be relying on our own implementation of all of the javamail classes. Unfortunately, as I discovered, the Geronimo version is not complete yet. I'm working on completing the implementation of InternetAddress, plus some changes in Transport. If you know what needs to be fixed in MimeMessage, you ahead and begin work on that.

If so then I can simply extend and do the POP3 stuff with it. But I am willing to help to since it's just not nice to sit back and let Rick do the dirty work. So Rick if you can tell me when I can chip in then we can finish it quickly and then I can finish with the POP3 as well. Regards, Rajith Attapattu. On 1/4/06, *Geir Magnusson Jr* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:



    Jacek Laskowski wrote:
    > 2006/1/4, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>:
    >
    >
    >>Nice work.  My preference would be RFC822.  However, I do wonder how
    >>many people might get bitten by this - that are depending on the
    broken
    >>behavior.  Sun's JavaMail has been around for quite a
    while.  Maybe a
    >>"org.apache.geronimo.be.broken.like.sun" property to allow
    people that
    >>do depend on it to turn it on?
    >
    >
    > Seriously, that /might/ be helpful, e.g. while migrating apps to
    Geronimo.
    >

    I was dead serious :)

    Right now, it appears that we have more people working on JavaMail
    implementation than Sun does.  Granted, theirs is complete, but still.
    This is an area where it would be nice to see an OSS community
    working,
    and it's darn useful software as well.

    *If* Sun's bug is something people depend on, then we wouldn't want to
    make our software unusable by them - we'd also be letting them know
    their apps aren't RFC compliant, and they'd have the option to fix at
    their choosing.

    geir



Reply via email to