On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Dain Sundstrom wrote: > On Jan 18, 2006, at 10:20 PM, lichtner wrote: > > > This state is transactional, I take it? > > Nope. For OpenEJB, only stateful session beans (SFSB) would use this api.
I see. I plan to never use them, if I can help it. > EJB Entity beans in OpenEJB or really any shared persistence data > would need a different API as the data is supposed to be shared by > multiple simultaneous clients. That's what I thought.
