Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Jan 27, 2006, at 10:54 AM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
On 27 Jan 2006, at 18:20, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Dain,
David is talking about how SessionManagers (effectively extended
SessionFactories) should be plumbed into Geronimo (i.e. GBeans),
not about the API's describing Sessions themselves.
I've looked at the stuff in modules/session - it looks very
similar to some WADI internals - there is loads of overlap here.
I have some serious plans for converging WADI with ActiveSpace
and would be happy to consider further changes to reuse or
contribute to your sessions module. We should talk.
I'll jot my ideas down and post them shortly.
How about just implementing the Session APi directly using WADI? :)
That's something that we could look at. I'd be interested to hear
you plans for actually integrating the sessions with some container
(web, ejb, etc...) as well - WADI is already doing this. Did you
have a route in mind ?
My plans extend to EJB integration,
We already have one well under way...
and I think James is going integrate this into lingo and service mix,
but I also think the API will work for servlet.
I'm going to look more closely at it today
I am quite interested in seeing a single API for session management
(not all of clustering just session management)
I'm not clear here - you mean a single API for Session Clustering - yes
? This is also one of WADI's goals...
that we can all share and is neutral towards implementation. I
expect we will see multiple implementations of the API from
opensource (wadi, activecluster, ehcache, etc), ISVs (Tangosol, IBM,
etc), and general JCache (JSR 107).
cheers,
Jules
-dain
--
"Open Source is a self-assembling organism. You dangle a piece of
string into a super-saturated solution and a whole operating-system
crystallises out around it."
/**********************************
* Jules Gosnell
* Partner
* Core Developers Network (Europe)
*
* www.coredevelopers.net
*
* Open Source Training & Support.
**********************************/
