I think the uber jar is convenient but it's already causing a rat's nest of
issues. I'd support dropping it.
Jason Dillon wrote:
IMO uberjar is more trouble than it is worth.
--jason
-----Original Message-----
From: "Alan D. Cabrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:26:09
To:[email protected]
Subject: Re: Geronimo Specs 1.1-SNAPSHOT -- more opinions please!
David Blevins wrote, On 1/30/2006 11:39 AM:
On Jan 30, 2006, at 11:24 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
If we moved to Maven 2 and used its transitive dependencies, would
the the need for an Uber jar be obviated?
For maven 2 all we need is an uber pom. For people on maven 1 and ant
and plain IDEs, an uber jar is nice.
Following that line of reasoning, should we not have a super-uber jar
that contains the specs, Geronimo, and its depdendencies? I think that
it's better to do away w/ the uber jar all together.
Regards,
Alan
