[X] +1 Document issue in release notes and defer fix to 1.1
This situation is very unfortunate, but I don't think fixing this can
possible be justified in a 1.0.x point release due to the extensive
modifications of basic geronimo plumbing necessary for a forward
compatible solution, and I don't see anyone willing to work on it for
1.0.1.
thanks
david jencks
On Feb 1, 2006, at 9:48 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
There was some discussion on Irc earlier this week about the issue
related to plans having to be changed due to module versions
changing. This is clearly going to be a significant issues for
customers as they will have to re-work all their plans on
incremental server changes. Although these will most likely be
tolerated in the short-term this is a serious shortcoming in the
current design that needs to be addressed.
During the discussion it was asserted tha given the magnitude of
the change to the format of the plans and changes to G it was not
appropriate for make this change in a maintenance release. The
collective wisdom was to declare in the release notes this issue
and give the user guidance with the assurance this is being
addressed in 1.1 (or there abouts).
Since there has been a lot of discussion about this already and it
being such a significant issue I thought I'd request a vote to see
where we stand.
[ ] +1 Document issue in release notes and defer fix to 1.1
[ ] 0 Not that important one way or another
[ ] -1 This is an issue that must be resolved in the 1.0.x branch
[ ] Other...provide your reasons.
