+1
On 2/14/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just to tie this up so it won't be left hanging - since Dain has already
> started moving forward with the ip document in incubator and declared
> his intention to commit the code tomorrow ...
>
> My point was that this should have been presented before the vote on the
> dev list ("So here's why I want to bring XBean to Geronimo and why it's
> appropriate for Geronimo"), rather than it be assumed that everyone is
> familiar with whatever off-list or historical conversations have taken
> place around this.
>
> I'm not against this - I was the one trying to get Dain to bring it back
> to Geronimo last summer when he first took it to Codehaus - but I think
> that the motivations for bringing in code that is out of main scope of
> the project deserves some illumination.
>
> geir
>
>
> James Strachan wrote:
> > On 1 Feb 2006, at 15:53, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> >> I asked a while ago and I think my question was never answered -
> >>
> >> why bring XBean into Geronimo?
> >
> > ActiveMQ, Jetty, OpenEJB, ServiceMix are all using it as an optional
> > lightweight kernel for efficient and concise configuration and
> > deployment in Spring-ish ways. It is a very useful core piece of technology
> > and quite a lot of us are pretty excited to work with it in Geronimo
> >
> > James
> > -------
> > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
> >
> >
>
--
============================
Srinath Perera:
http://www.cs.indiana.edu/~hperera/
http://www.bloglines.com/blog/hemapani
