On Feb 15, 2006, at 1:23 PM, David Blevins wrote:
So we should call it something like:
<configuration>
...
<naming-properties>
<property>
<name>base-name</name>
<value>geronimo.maven:J2EEServer=geronimo</value>
</property>
</naming-properties>
...
</configuration>
Cause IMHO, having a <configuration> element with a <properties>
sub element implies something all together different:
<configuration>
...
<properties>
<property>
<name>base-name</name>
<value>geronimo.maven:J2EEServer=geronimo</value>
</property>
</properties>
...
</configuration>
The xml is more like this:
<configuration xmlns="http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/deployment-1.1";>
<environment>
<configId>
<groupId>geronimo</groupId>
<type>car</type>
<artifactId>geronimo-gbean-deployer</artifactId>
<version>1.0.1-SNAPSHOT</version>
</configId>
<properties>
<property>
<name>base-name</name>
<value>geronimo.maven:J2EEServer=geronimo</value>
</property>
</properties>
</environment>
</configuration>
I think it is fairly clear that these are properties of the
environment. Also I would prefer to not imply that these properties
are limited to only "naming-properties". I gut tells me that this
will be a useful extension place in the geronimo configurations.
-dain
