I will take a look. On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, James Strachan wrote:
> Have you taken a look at ActiveIO which we use for various low level > communication protocols like TCP, NIO, AIO etc... > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/trunk/activeio/ > > e.g. > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/trunk/activeio/ > activeio-core/src/main/java/org/apache/activeio/ > > it might prove a useful starting place to layer on protocols like > membership, mnak etc? > > We're already using ActiveIO in ActiveMQ and OpenEJB; I'm sure it > could be used in other places too. > > James > > > On 15 Feb 2006, at 19:38, lichtner wrote: > > > > Is there any interest in an apache-licensed version of jgroups? > > > > I am thinking something along these lines: > > > > 1. Well-understood layered architecture, of x-kernel, Ensemble, and > > JGroups fame. > > > > 2. Performance-focused: low thread count per protocol layer (0+), > > no java > > serialization. > > > > 3. Simple: implement best-of-breed protocols only, and provide > > pre-assembled protocol stacks. > > > > 4. Release 1.0 with basic protocols: membership, mnak, flow > > control, etc. > > > > I would be happiest with an arrangement where somebody junior would > > code > > it and I would serve as an advisor (if needed) based on my > > experience with > > EVS4J, with the actual coder taking the credit for it. > > > > I would like to see Geronimo evolve quickly into an industrial > > strength > > server (which I think it will) so I can stop using all the other app > > servers .. > > > > Guglielmo > > > James > ------- > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ > >
