Sure. My personal preference is using "_version", but whatever the
consensus is with others I'm fine with.
- sachin
On Mar 4, 2006, at 5:23 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
2006/3/4, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Author: sppatel
Date: Sat Mar 4 10:26:01 2006
New Revision: 383164
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=383164&view=rev
Log:
more pom fixes
...
+ <geronimo_version>1.0</geronimo_version>
+ <commons_logging_version>1.0.4</commons_logging_version>
+ <ant_apache_oro_version>1.6.4</ant_apache_oro_version>
+ <xercesImpl_version>2.5.0</xercesImpl_version>
+ <xmlParsersAPIs_version>2.6.2</xmlParsersAPIs_version>
+ <stax-api_version>1.0</stax-api_version>
Hi Sachin,
Could we decide on the format of M2 variables? In Geronimo we use
geronimoVersion rather than geronimo_version, commonsLoggingVersion
rather than commons_logging_version and staxApiVersion rather than
stax-api_version. Although the proposed solution might not be
appropriate for all cases, it tends to be consistent. A mixture of the
underscores, the dashes and camelCase parts in these variables might
be very confusing in the foreseeable future.
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.laskowski.org.pl
