Bill Dudney wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Seems I jumped the gun and did not write up a JIRA for this before > getting started. I've got most of the Servlet 2.5 and JSP 2.1 api's > typed in. I want to take one more pass over them to make sure I have > all the correct exceptions on the methods and other details like that.
No problems - it's good that the job is done. Yell when they are checked in and I'll proof read them and give them a run against Jetty 6. Also have a look at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/GrandCentralProposal a proposal (work in progress) to move the APIs to a top level project. cheers > I'll be submitting a patch early next week that has both of these api > projects. > > Sorry for not entering a jira issue on it earlier.... > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1686 > > TTFN, > > Bill Dudney > MyFaces - myfaces.apache.org > > > On Mar 2, 2006, at 12:55 AM, Greg Wilkins wrote: > >> >> All, >> >> I'm tuning back into G after zoning out for a while.... >> I'd like to started work on the jetty6 integration to >> provide servlet 2.5 >> >> The goals of the jetty 6 integration will be: >> + 2.5 servlet API. >> + annotation support >> + Simplify integration using Jetty 6 interceptor friendly architecture. >> + Use geronimo threadpool >> + Use Session API ( or iteration of that (see comments posted >> earlier)) as >> basis of session manager >> + Experiment with WADI and clustering integration >> + Better JACC specific security handler (perhaps to be back ported >> to Jetty) >> + Potentially use common server socket factories and eventually SSL >> Engine >> factories >> >> For this I'm going to created a branch geronimo/sandbox/servlet-2.5 >> and add geronimo-spec-servlet to geronimo/spec/branches/JEE5 >> >> I'm going for a full branch: >> >> + because I actually want to see how hard it will be to use >> svn to maintain a parallel dev branch. >> + I want some stability >> + I think there will be some moderately global changes that >> may affect multiple modules. >> + The branch will be a good place for a 2.5 tomcat module >> to be developed at the same time. >> >> everybody OK with this? >> I'd like to start this soonish, although I'm tempted to wait >> for maven2 to be working. >> >> cheers >> >> >> >> > >
