On 3/6/06, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What more generic network protocol layer?
I was thinking of ActiveIO... maybe I didn't describe it very
accurately. :) We've certainly also talked about trying to unify the
SSL configuration for all the network using services and providing an
SSLSocketFactory that can be configured with a single Keystore without
needing to configure the private key password separately for each of
the services and so on, but I'll grant that is a little further off.
Thanks,
Aaron
>
> On Mar 6, 2006, at 12:08 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
>
> > By that we mean, you must authenticate to access the EJB, but the data
> > transferred between client and server and back is not encrypted.
> >
> > We have a more generic network protocol layer around, but as far as I
> > know it hasn't been integrated into OpenEJB yet. Having people ask
> > for it certainly helps improve the priority. Can you tell us a little
> > more about your application/usage? What kind of client and EJBs are
> > you talking about? What kind of security do you need?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Aaron
> >
> > On 3/6/06, Tero Mäntyvaara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> I am searching Java Enterprise Edition server capable of securing
> >> communication between EJB client and server.
> >>
> >> I found that Geronimo 1.0 doumentation mentions that it does not
> >> support
> >> secure connection between EJB client and server "Currently secure
> >> access to EJBs is not supported" (9.6. Configuring SSL/HTTPS).
> >>
> >> When this feature is going to be supported?
> >>
> >> Tero Mäntyvaara
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
