Hi Geir,
They are part of the schema in the spec pdf, no claimed copyright in
the schema definition.
TTFN,
Bill Dudney
MyFaces - myfaces.apache.org
On Mar 8, 2006, at 4:48 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
if the comments are part of someone else's copyrighted material,
and it's not under a permissive open source license, please don't
copy them.
geir
Bill Dudney wrote:
So I will go ahead and type the comments (I'm more than half way
through it anyway) and then we can delete them if we need to.
OK?
Jeff or anyone else, who should I go to for official statement?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TTFN,
Bill Dudney
MyFaces - myfaces.apache.org
Wadi - incubator.apache.org/wadi
On Mar 7, 2006, at 4:04 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
John Sisson wrote:
We shouldn't retype the comments in the XSD just like the
javadoc in the
spec. You are welcome to type your own original comments.
This is debatable for XSDs. We currently seem to be using a lot
of XSDs
verbatim for the SPECs, so we need an official statement on this.
Thanks,
John
Bill Dudney wrote:
Hi All,
I think this must have gotten lost in the traffic over the
weekend.
Anyone know if I should/have to retype all the documentation
comments
in the XSD?
Thanks,
Bill Dudney
MyFaces - myfaces.apache.org
On Mar 5, 2006, at 6:50 AM, Bill Dudney wrote:
One other question - the documentation comments in the XML
schema for
the spec? Should I type in these comments or leave them out?
Thanks,
-bd-
On Mar 3, 2006, at 1:00 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
BTW add a jira for this, so everyone knows you are working on
it.
-dain
On Mar 3, 2006, at 10:02 AM, Bill Dudney wrote:
Hi All,
Thanks for the comments.
Dain: Yeah its not copying out of the pdf but simply typing,
hardly
feels like original work though so even though I'm not
copying, it
sure feels like it. :-)
I'll leave the comments out and post a patch after I get one
more
pass over it (~early next week).
TTFN,
Bill Dudney
MyFaces - myfaces.apache.org
On Mar 3, 2006, at 10:43 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Mar 3, 2006, at 9:37 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Mar 3, 2006, at 9:10 AM, Bill Dudney wrote:
Hi All,
I've started getting ready for JSF 1.2 and figured that a
good
place for the api jar to land is the uber spec project @
G for
JavaEE 5.
I'm most of the way there for Servlet 2.5 and JSP 2.1 but
I was
wondering about javadoc. Does anyone know what the rules are
regarding javadoc in the spec code? I've just been doing a
straight copy/typing of the api and leaving out the
javadoc. But
looking back at the Servlet 2.4 and JSP 2.0 spec modules
all the
javadoc is there.
No "copying" only "typing" is allowed.
I'd like to submit the patch for Servlet 2.5 and JSP 2.1
in the
next week or so. If anyone knows the definitive answer
(or since
we are not lawyers as close to definitive as possible:)
I'd love
to hear it.
I have not been copying the javadocs into the specs I have
worked
on. I think that our servlet 2.4 and jsp 2.0 specs are
copied
from tomcat where they were IIUC donated complete with
javadocs
by sun. I think leaving out the javadoc is the wisest
course.
Yes, the javadoc comments are owned by Sun. If you would
like to
write your own *original* javadoc comments, that would be
cool,
but not necessary.
-dain
