Exactly the right question - the copyright isn't the issue, but the
license is.
Where did these schemas come from, and what are the listed terms?
geir
Bill Stoddard wrote:
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
2006/3/9, Bill Stoddard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Don't change the copyright statements. The only time it is acceptable
to change copyright statements is when
the copyright holder has assigned copyright ownership to the ASF.
Has it been assigned? If not, my understanding is that we're not
allowed to store them in the repo, either.
That's the wrong question. ASF repositories contain lots of code for
which the ASF is not the copyright owner. Whether we are allowed to
store code in our repositories depends on the license terms and
conditions issued by the copyright holder. What are the T&C's for this
code? Do we know?
Bill
