On Mar 13, 2006, at 5:31 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Mar 13, 2006, at 5:05 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I understand this concern and agree with the solution, but we should
remember that AMQ entered the incubator before this was a rule, so I
for one didn't think it appled to them, since they are so close to
graduation.
'So close to graduation'? Whence comes that? I think that
proximity is still very much up in the air, particularly given
Noel's opinion that
If you read the email history, you will see that it was stated that
the new rules would only apply to "projects close to gradation".
So I hope you can see my point, regardless of if you agree with
that point.
I just realized the size of the cross posting on this thread. To be
specific, I am referring to the proposed new rules thread on the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] list (which isn't even on this cross post). Of
course, I can't point to a specific email that made this policy, but
that was my understanding at the time.
Official policy documents would be really nice, especially
considering they take a huge amount of time to develop and would
hopefully slow down the rate of change in the incubator.
Sorry about that,
-dain
