> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > Personally, I believe that ActiveMQ ought to be a TLP.
> Just to be clear, though, that's just a personal opinion
Which part of "Personally, I believe" wasn't clear? ;-)
> > What makes a project with multiple codebases an umbrella
> > is a gray area.
> I've posted *my* first-pass definition of the term: a TLP that
> has no deliverable packages of its own, only from its subprojects.
So Geronimo would not be, DB would be?
> that's my working definition.
Not at all bad for a first cut. Certainly thought provoking.
--- Noel
