Jason Dillon wrote:
Would you then move all the code inside to the same package, as in
org.apache.geronimo.modules.kernel or
org.apache.geronimo.applications.daytrader?
    

Package names do not need to relate directly to Maven groupIds. 
Especially not for intermediate grouping modules, that do not directly
relate to code anyways.

I do not recommend that package names be altered at this time.  Once
maven2 conversion is finished and it is time to rethink the general
structure, it might be a good idea  to try and sync up package names.

I don't think that we ever want to have a
org.apache.geronimo.modules.kernel... but perhaps a
org.apache.geronimo.applications.daytrader.
  

Good point.


Regards,
Alan


Reply via email to