Ok, So I was chatting with David Jencks on IRC yesterday, and G 1.1 will stick with the AMQ 3.x branch for now since there seems to be a big push to get G 1.1 out the door and introducing AMQ 4.x could add more delays. But due to a kernel change in 1.1, David is going to update the gbean integration in AMQ 3.x and will will be cutting and using a ActiveMQ 3.2.4.
I've finished porting the 1.2 (trunk) branch to ActiveMQ 4.x. OpenEJB still has a ActiveMQ 3.2.1 dependency due to WADI. This is causing the finally assembly to include both versions :( Hey Jules, can WADI/ActiveCluster run with 4.x yet? Please let me know if this broke anything. Regards, Hiram On 3/26/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wow.. I'm a bit confused with all the version stuff then... I've been > working off trunk which I assumed was 1.1. I'll attach a patch of > what I have so far against trunk. You'll see that I've had to update > a bunch of project.xml files in a bunch of modules. So I think we > need to branch the whole trunk. > > If you want, go ahead and create the branch and I'll apply my patch. > > Also seem the console was providing some DLQ management features. But > the interfaces into this stuff in AMQ 4.x has changed substantially. > I think we will need to disable that portlet until it can be properly > ported. > > > On 3/26/06, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Mar 26, 2006, at 11:29 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote: > > > > > Hi David, > > > > > > I've started to update my geronimo 1.1 working copy to use amq 4. > > > > Are you sure you mean g 1.1? That is the still broken branch only > > Dain and I have been working on. g trunk is 1.2 now. > > > If > > > your interested in helping port it over, then yeah I think a branch > > > would be a good idea. > > > > > > What should the branch name be? > > > > Well, we called the g. branch configid for a while, then changed it > > to 1.1 So I think either G_1.1 or configId would be reasonable. > > > > We might only need to branch the gbeans rather than all of AMQ, what > > do you think? > > > > > > thanks > > david jencks > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > Hiram > > > > > > On 3/26/06, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Geronimo 1.1 needs some changes in the activemq gbeans in order for > > >> activemq to be able to start and be managed by the console. Which > > >> version(s) should I make the modifications in? Should I make an AMQ > > >> branch for this? > > >> > > >> The problems I've identified so far are: > > >> > > >> - The management helper gbean needs extensive modifications to use > > >> AbstractNames rather than ObjectNames. > > >> > > >> - The JDBCPersistenceAdapterGBean uses an AMQ interface in its > > >> reference to dataSource: this no longer works as we now check that a > > >> target gbean declares the interface you ask for in a reference. > > >> > > >> Thanks > > >> david jencks > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Regards, > > > Hiram > > > > > > > -- > Regards, > Hiram > > > -- Regards, Hiram
