Here are some additional thoughts. I think the console would stay as Paul
indicated as well as the jmxdebug (isn't there a better version out there?
Simon?) Not sure about the UDDI stuff.
Here is what might remain:
drwxr-xr-x 11 hogstrom hogstrom 374 Mar 17 11:20 console-core
drwxr-xr-x 11 hogstrom hogstrom 374 Mar 17 11:21 console-ear
drwxr-xr-x 11 hogstrom hogstrom 374 Mar 28 10:52 console-framework
drwxr-xr-x 11 hogstrom hogstrom 374 Mar 28 10:52 console-standard
drwxr-xr-x 14 hogstrom hogstrom 476 Apr 2 16:23 jmxdebug
drwxr-xr-x 14 hogstrom hogstrom 476 Apr 2 16:23 remote-deploy
drwxr-xr-x 14 hogstrom hogstrom 476 Apr 2 16:23 remote-deploy-lib
drwxr-xr-x 12 hogstrom hogstrom 408 Apr 2 16:23 uddi-db
drwxr-xr-x 14 hogstrom hogstrom 476 Apr 2 16:23 uddi-server
Already moving out
drwxr-xr-x 17 hogstrom hogstrom 578 Mar 28 10:52 daytrader
Should move out to samples someplace
drwxr-xr-x 18 hogstrom hogstrom 612 Apr 2 16:23 magicGball
drwxr-xr-x 14 hogstrom hogstrom 476 Apr 2 16:23 demo
drwxr-xr-x 12 hogstrom hogstrom 408 Apr 2 16:23 ldap-realm-demo
drwxr-xr-x 14 hogstrom hogstrom 476 Apr 2 16:23 welcome
Paul McMahan wrote:
Hi Jacek, since the console application is so intricately tied to the
kernel and deployment APIs and since it is also an important part of
the resulting assemblies I think it would be best to keep at least
that one application in the same repository as the application server.
Best wishes,
Paul
On 4/2/06, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
While migrating the applications to M2 I came up with the idea to move
that directory to its own repository, just like daytrader or devtools,
off Geronimo the application server tree. What do you think?
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.laskowski.org.pl
