On 4/5/06, Bruce Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/5/06, Sachin Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Could we just provide a single status file for all archives with info
> > like... This way rather then a user having to traverse directories
> > all the info is available in the single file.
> >
> > ARCHIVE, LAST PUBLISH TIME, LAST PUBLISH STATE, LAST PUBLISH MESSAGE
>
> This is certainly an interesting idea and maybe a step toward
> versioning of apps that are deployed in Geronimo. I like this idea a
> lot, but I'm curious to discuss this in more detail. Based on the
> proposed status above, how will this work when there are many copies
> of a given app? Will the deployer subsystem need to rake all of these
> files and then determine the version to actually deploy? I think we
> need a richer model than that, especially when considering clustering.
Actually, isn't a Maven repo embedded in 1.1? We could probably make
use of this for versioning apps.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL
PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
Apache Geronimo (http://geronimo.apache.org/)
Castor (http://castor.org/)
