-+0 I redirect them to a specific JIRA folder in Thunderbird and review them anyway. If people are
putting them in the trash then leaving them on the main list really doesn't matter but for those
that are new they'll know they're there and can filter accordingly. Personally I don't have a
preference one way or the other.
Sachin Patel wrote:
+1 I like the idea over redirecting them to SCM. Less smart mailboxes
I have to create :)
- sachin
On Apr 7, 2006, at 1:49 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Any thoughts on John's [EMAIL PROTECTED] idea?
-David
On Apr 6, 2006, at 7:57 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
-0 on jira to scm. scm has *much* more messages plowing through it. I
will never catch jira's there. JIRA to dev seems to be a great way to
alert developers of issues that need fixing. I personally am able to
see anything that affects code that I produced through the jiras on
dev.
But thats my selfish view ;-)
Jeff
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
David can you change the tag [jira] on the subject to something
else. I
filter all [jira] notices into the trash^H^H^^H^H jira folder :)
Actually what does everyone think of redirecting jira notices to
the scm
list, and leave David's awesome summary reports coming to this list?
-dain
On Apr 6, 2006, at 4:20 PM, David Blevins wrote:
All, we have a new report to be embarrassed ^H^H^H motivated by.
If you have a moment, look in the 1+ year section and see if there
aren't some items which can just be deleted.
-David
On Apr 6, 2006, at 3:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
1 WEEK (8 issues)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Key
Summary Reporter Created
GERONIMO-1800 SPECjAppServer2004 Deployment
Descriptors Vasily Zakharov Apr 03,
2006
GERONIMO-1804 The name of JNDI/RMI service provider is hardcoded in
the sources. Andrey Pavlenko Apr 05, 2006
GERONIMO-1805 org.apache.geronimo.directory.RunningTest hangs on
BEA
Jrockit VMs Alexei Zakharov Apr 05, 2006
