On Apr 19, 2006, at 6:51 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
Thanks. What criteria has been used to set the geronimo.dependency
property in project.xml? The packaging of most configurations assumes
the packaged configuration will be loaded on top of j2ee-system
configuration. But the 'applications' configurations implicitly assume
that a full server, i.e jetty/tomcat is running. Is this correct?
yes.
If
yes, Should we add these configurations (specified by
deploymnetConfig)
to the plans for documentation?
no
Is this information stored in
config.ser and the deployer makes sure that these are already loaded?
yes. The secret is in the defaultEnvironment attributes of the
various builders, which add the necessary parents for each type of
j2ee artifact. For instance the jetty builder adds jetty, connector
builder adds connector, etc etc. You can suppress these defaults in
case you have special requirements by using the
suppressDefaultEnvironment element in environment.
In 1.0/1.2 this is not as well developed or consistent as in 1.1: the
builders have attributes defaultParentId.
thanks
david jencks
Thanks
Anita
--- David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Apr 17, 2006, at 6:45 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
David,
Thanks! How is j2ee-system configuration started now?
j2ee-system is the "root" configuration of the main geronimo server,
and the config.ser file is actually in server.jar. The Daemon
locates it in the classpath and starts it, see line 251.
The naming is slightly confusing. The server.jar contains
j2ee-system configuraion and not j2ee-server.
thanks
david jencks
Thanks
Anita
--- David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Apr 16, 2006, at 9:20 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
The j2ee-security configuration imports only rmi-naming
configuration. What about j2ee-server configuration?
I think calling the server side security config j2ee-security
might
be misleading; perhaps we should call it server-security. In any
case, it doesn't need anything from j2ee-server, so it doesn't
import
it.
thanks
david jencks
Thanks
Anita
--- Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Apr 11, 2006, at 11:41 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 4/11/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In 1.1, I moved the corba system properties into a new
SystemProperties GBean in the j2ee-corba plan.
Hi Dain,
Will it be merged with trunk?If *I* wanted to merge it with
trunk,
should I try to figure out the revision by taking a look at
j2ee-corba
plan and commit these changes to trunk?
sure
-dain
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
