I would need to agree with Alan and Matt on this... -1 for 1.1 +1 for 1.2
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Matt Hogstrom wrote:I'm for the change but as I ponder the ramifications to 1.1 I'm afraid the scope of this modification is too large. The TCK needs to be updated, lots of hard references, etc.I vote that we change this in 1.2 and leave them as configId for now. If we take this on I'm confident that we'll miss Java One.-1 for 1.1 +1 for 1.2 Thoughts?-1 1.1 +1 1.2 Regards, Alan
