+1 on #3. We should not the JDK 1.5 concerns in the readme.
I also like Dave Colasurdo's suggestion that we issue a warning message
if we can detect that we are running on JDK 1.5 and CORBA EJBs are being
used. Not sure how feasible (or visible) it will be to add those
warnings but it would be nice to have.
Joe
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
I wanted to clarify what our plan is for the JVM Check that is done to
verify that a user is running on Java 1.4. If someone chooses to accept
the responsibility and use Java 1.5 it would be rather annoying to have
this message come out every time.
I think we have three options:
1. Leave it as is (warning comes out all the time)
2. Allow someone to set a property or other mechanism to tell the server
to not to issue the warning message.
3. Take the message out because 1.1 will tolerate 1.5 and we're not
shipping DayTrader installed so the javax.xml.namespace.QName problem
won't be visible.
Personally I prefer 3 if there are no other issues.
Thoughts?
Matt
--
Joe Bohn
joe.bohn at earthlink.net
"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep, to gain what he cannot
lose." -- Jim Elliot