-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Aaron Mulder wrote: > I thought the point of this thread was to have a discussion? Please, > let's not have any more votes, let's have a discussion. Can you > describe your position?
In the meantime, two people have invoked the 'review' part of commit-then-review and expressed vetos. Vetos need to have technical justification and this is a grey area -- is this a technical thing or a philosophical one? -- but in the interest of amity I'm going to rule it's a technical one. Please revert the look-elsewhere-by-default change until this is settled. > I think it makes perfect sense to move documentation and tutorials to > the Geronimo/Confluence/Apache site. But my understanding of the > Apache distribution rules is that no code not developed at Apache can > be distributed by the Apache infrastructure. Correct. > To be as inclusive as possible of non-Apache BSD, GPL, and commercial > plugins, I think the primary plugin repository needs to be separate. This is part of the issue. The other part is making the change without discussion. Which, under CTR, is fine -- but the 'review' aspect has been activated and lazy consensus no longer applies. - -- #ken P-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millennium hand and shrimp!" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQCVAwUBRFeRaZrNPMCpn3XdAQLUfwP9G7KBJKQ7+fKuinOiEaaZI9VouqCpLb0b hYTHNBBMlhbtLiyYeMtnuwNn3VknycwwDIvr827yoVM52ifj2fQ4Tcq93cKx/srW ITrqBaoDfUTqJtaygID6C8ysebDuh+MTo6VRKyeCch7KnEA7dwoasREuUUirLOYw TTAHd9aaHXk= =jbh8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
