-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jason Dillon wrote: > What concerns about changes are you speaking of? I have so far seen > no such concerns. Can you please elaborate.
By their very natures you wouldn't see them blatantly stated. Concerns that have been brought to me, from people both inside and outside the project, that too much is going on in backchannels and offline; that som changes are being pushed through by mutual offline agreements among the strongest personalities; that the voting/veto system is being 'gamed;' that private email is being used to intimidate people who would raise flags. That anyone has such concerns is bad enough. That they're held by no small number of people calls for steps to be taken to show them founded or unfounded. - -- #ken P-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millennium hand and shrimp!" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQCVAwUBRHGXWZrNPMCpn3XdAQJtkgP/UXsUfoOyeN4zoU+lJYTLasNPrPkoqAS1 Pj1kJhePkj0PkUGO/rGqK+6o5WiNTUDDyLCzOe4g8eqAGMqnlyGC2QzhwfIWSV2W weqFK0PQ0RDU2Yqr3uqxnF2syITXkKHL0OfqO7MDUutuhzfoVL3TqBJRoGj4/l0R tUQTGxDBUnI= =QFNj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
