Opps. I just reviewed that patch. and It does not seem to be valid. I think I may have jumped the gun on putting in my -1. So I'm retracting my -1 for now, and asking for anybody out there that is interested in the openwire internals to peek into the AMQ-718 and double check me.
Thanks! On 5/22/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I retract my +1.. This issue has just been reported: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-718 We have a small inconsistency in our wireformat that if we don't fix now, we will never be able to fix. So -1 on the release, and I'll start working on applying the provided patch. Thanks for the sharp eyes Andrew Lusk! On 5/20/06, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > James Strachan wrote: > > We've had the 4.0 release cut for a little while and we've tested it > > out and it seems to be fine and to comply with the various release > > requirements (notice file, incubator disclaimers, license files etc) > > > > http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0/maven1/incubator-activemq/distributions/ > > > > > > The release notes will show up here as soon as the mirrors catch up... > > http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/activemq-40-release.html > > > > if you are impatient, here's the wiki page for the release notes: > > http://goopen.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+4.0+Release > > > > Please vote to approve this release binary > > > > [ ] +1 Release the binary as ActiveMQ 4.0 > > [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments) > > > > If this vote passes, then we will then ask the Incubator PMC for their > > blessing to ship this release officially. > > > > Here's my +1 > > > +1 > > Congrats on all the great work! > > > Regards, > Alan > > > -- Regards, Hiram
-- Regards, Hiram
