+1 new trunk

Jeff Genender wrote:
Let me follow this up too with some support...

JIRA GERONIMO-2046 is a patch (by Bill Dudney) for the first swipe at
full replication using the session API.  I want to apply the patch to
place the code into the sandbox, but I need the session API available.
We will need it in the new trunk, and thus was asking that it be merged
for the new trunk from 1.2, so that we may push forward with this first
swipe, since its a dependency.

I hope that helps.

I think I have 2 +1s (Dain and DJ)...need one more ;-)

Thanks,

Jeff

Jeff Genender wrote:
Let me make myself clear from my original message, since I think there
is confusion as to what I was asking:

When I referred to 1.1, I placed into parenthesis, "the new trunk
version that is".

I only have intentions of it going into *some* trunk, assuming it will
be the newly branded trunk based on 1.1.  I did not want to build this
off of 1.2-dead for obvious reasons.

I do *not* at all mean that this should go in the 1.1 release, and I
would -1 that myself...I just want it in the new trunk when its cut.

Jeff

Dain Sundstrom wrote:
+1 to merge it to the new trunk.

-0.5 to merge it into 1.1... I don't see any ready to move it into 1.1. There are no users or implementations yet. If someone writes one for
1.1, they can ship a plugin containing the session apis.

-dain

On May 22, 2006, at 10:13 AM, David Jencks wrote:

I'm fine with it going into trunk after 1.1 is branched.  I'm not at
all fine with it going into 1.1 and getting released in 1.1: I don't
think we should release an api that has not been  proved to work well.

thanks
david jencks

On May 22, 2006, at 9:54 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:

We have an initial swipe at some clustering to put into the sandbox, but
will have a need for the session api ;-)

Anyone have issue with putting the session API in 1.1 (the new trunk
version that is)? (Need 3 +1s)

Jeff

Reply via email to