Let's move this discussion to the other thread then. Thanks Jason
Jason Dillon wrote:
I forget who said it... but I'm gonna bet that if we skip 1.2, that it
will just confuse people.
So, here is my -1, to effectively skipping 1.2 by making it a dead branch.
I don't see any reason why we can not continue using 1.2-SNAPSHOT for
the soon to be trunk and call the current soon to be replaced as
1.2-DEAD or something along those lines... or if this really is dead
code then delete it as Geir suggested.
I don't think that skipping 1.2 as an official release target for G is
a good idea.
--jason
On 5/22/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To make sure we're all on the same page here is a suggested naming
convention for the build environment:
1.1 - Current release we're working on
1.2 - dead version of what's currently in trunk
1.3 - what will be coming on Wednesday morning assuming there are no -1s
So far all votes have been +1 and I think using the above version
numbers will avoid confusion
during the transition period.
