-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 James Strachan wrote: > > So I was wondering; maybe we should create mailing lists for XBean and > then it becomes effectively a new subproject with its own identity. > > Given the slow release cycles of Geronimo, XBean could end up being > the cool & trendy young sister project, releasing often which could > innovate and help gain traction faster which, given that stuff that > works in XBean will ultimately work great in Geronimo too is a win-win > alround.
If XBean is as separate as all that, it should be its own project and not part of Geronimo. Separate codebase, separate Web pages, separate mailing lists, and probably separate JIRA.. then there's no point in misleading ourselves that it's part of Geronimo. So as long as it *is* part of Geronimo, it has to at least share the Geronimo mailing lists. Balkanisation has been found here to be definitely counterproductive. - -- #ken P-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millennium hand and shrimp!" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQCVAwUBRHWv3prNPMCpn3XdAQJZxgP8DegCWpLEQksRcQ+HKfPBUsxQAL9QQGoH /7m/RKrm3iKTY7c9HWozyzS5PZhmFxk/GIJ6LTBWUxQa41m2AXUxbKY/NU/iC2A6 O9nKFbpOVh0Rrf8kKnr1qHSeuCFSwkdkO188kG9Ffux6T8RZ7QsZgD/a+oqfWxer NJ3e20Gjksk= =Hn7w -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
