Why 2 versions of TranQL? --jason
On 5/31/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here are the outstanding issues and my proposed plans to finish 1.1. Currently there are 124 JIRAs out there for 1.1. There are also 7 or 8 blockers. I have not seen any activity on these items in the last week so I'm assuming that there is no resource to fix them. I propose that tomorrow I'll move the JIRA's in 1.1 to 1.2 and for those items that are considered hot and people want to work on them they can move them to the 1.1.1 release. I'll do this through a bulk change. The remaining items are: Convert remaining SNAPSHOTs to releases. Here is the remaining list of items: activemq_version=3.2.4-SNAPSHOT geronimo_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT openejb_version=2.1-SNAPSHOT tranql_version=1.2-SNAPSHOT tranql_version=1.3-SNAPSHOT geronimo_spec_corba_version=1.0-SNAPSHOT geronimo_spec_j2ee_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT geronimo_spec_javamail_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT geronimo_spec_jcache_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT daytrader_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT I will convert DayTrader and TranQL after the final set of stress testing. Any volunteers to convert the specs? (Alan :) Kevan, we'll need you to sign off on the activemq versions. When the above is complete I suggest we get a final test from Kevan and cut a proposed 1.1 for Friday. If that's good (or if there are only minor fixes) we'll push 1.1 out next week and then move on to 1.2 and beyond. Thoughts? Matt
