[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1492?page=comments#action_12414442
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-1492:
----------------------------------------
re
2) There are sections like the one below in many of the files. I'm not
convinced this is correct syntax. Is it legal to list only part of a module
name in a module element in a reference?
<reference name="ServerInfo">
- <module>org/apache/geronimo/System</module>
+ <module>geronimo/j2ee-system</module>
<name>ServerInfo</name>
</reference>
These should simply remove the module element. Plans with references like
these need to have e.g. in this case j2ee-system in their ancestor set, so its
possible that dependencies need to be added to the plan as well.
> Many "org/apache/geronimo" configIds still live in source tree
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-1492
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1492
> Project: Geronimo
> Type: Bug
> Security: public(Regular issues)
> Versions: 1.0
> Reporter: Aaron Mulder
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 1.1
> Attachments: GERONIMO-1492.diff, annotated-grep-output.txt
>
> I created a couple separate issues, but beyond those a quick search brought
> up a few more in magic G ball and day trader -- I stopped before it went any
> further, but we should grep for that and try to eliminate all the references
> to old-style config IDs.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
