+1. The m2 work in dead-1.2 included modules, deployment-plugin and all the apps. They all passed tests too. We can consider the m2 work from dead-1.2 merged when we have got these building and testing successfully into new trunk.
Cheers Prasad On 6/5/06, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 5, 2006, at 9:42 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote: > On 6/5/06, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> You can see what you (or someone else :-) did in dead-1.2 with e.g. >> >> grep djencks all_changes.log >> >> I think there are 329 changes (I did about 43). >> >> I propose that as we merge, verify the changes have already been >> merged, or decide they are obsolete we change the start of the line >> to "Merged" >> >> Comments? > > No comments so far, but I guess it can only mean we're all so happy > with your proposal we can't speak/write anything ;) It does help me > and am going to use/review it. Thanks! > > Do you think it's worth to apply the m2 patches given the > revolutionary approach taken in 1.1? I'd appreciate Anita's and > Prasad's comment on it. My understanding is that the patches I've been applying from GERONIMO-2071 are the port of the m2 work done previously on dead-1.2, so this effort is already well underway. After I went through the work I did personally in dead-1.2 I was planning to go through again and mark the dead-1.2 m2 work merged. Is this OK with everyone? thanks david jencks > >> david jencks > > Jacek > > -- > Jacek Laskowski > http://www.laskowski.net.pl
