On Jun 5, 2006, at 2:37 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
AFAIK, all specs poms have been changed and even specs with no code
changed
have been upgraded with a minor release to reflect the pom change.
These changes were mainly about unneeded transitive dependencies.
So I think all specs should be re-released.
If there are dependency improvements I definitely agree a new release
is needed. I am glad to hear of this :-)
thanks
david jencks
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Hiram Chirino wrote:
On 6/5/06, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The specs that have actually changed will get their version
incremented. The root POM that's shared by all the modules will
also
get its version incremented.
We just need to be careful that a mvn deploy at the root does not
rebuild and redeploy over previously deployed releases.
Regards,
Alan
David Jencks wrote:
> +1, assuming that these are only for the specs that have actually
> changed since 1.0.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Jun 5, 2006, at 12:29 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
>> I would like to make a new tag, v1.1, for the specs release.
This is
>> in preparation for the Geronimo v1.1 release.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>
