+1

-dain

On Jun 5, 2006, at 5:05 PM, David Jencks wrote:

After discussion I think we can all live with:

modules >> o.a.g
assemblies >> o.a.g
configs >> o.a.g.module
plugins >> o.a.g.plugin
applications >> o.a.g

note that it's "plugin" not "plugins" to match the package name. Similarly it's "module" not "modules" to match the number of the plugin groupId.

I don't want to make applications >> o.a.g.applications at this time because:
-  some of the apps are samples
- this doesn't match the package names.

I don't think a patch will serve any useful purpose but will supply one on request.

Here's my +1

Please vote

thanks
david jencks

Reply via email to