sorry :) its https://svn.codehaus.org/activemq/trunk/activemq/
regards chris On 6/7/06, Aaron Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/7/06, Christoph Sturm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > try http://svn.activemq.codehaus.org/ Nope. First, I assume that committers don't use HTTP. Second, that's Fisheye, and if you point SVN to it, you get svn: PROPFIND request failed on '/' svn: PROPFIND of '/': 501 Method+PROPFIND+is+not+defined+in+RFC+2068+and+is+not+supported+by+the+Servlet+API+ (http://svn.activemq.codehaus.org) Thanks, Aaron > On 6/6/06, Aaron Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What's the best way to get the ActiveMQ 3.2.4 code? > > > > I tried to update > > svn+ssh://svn.activemq.codehaus.org/svnroot/activemq/branches/activemq-3/activemq > > and it didn't take my password (even the one that beaver.codehaus.org > > says is my new SVN password). > > > > Then I tried to check out > > svn+ssh://svn.activemq.org/scm/activemq/branches/activemq-3/activemq > > and it doesn't prompt for a password and doesn't let me on with my > > public key. > > > > Thanks, > > Aaron > > > > On 6/6/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I resolved 1, and commented on the other issue. > > > > > > On 6/6/06, Paul McMahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Just wanted to send a reminder that there are a couple of patches > > > > waiting to be applied to AMQ 3.2.4 that address problems with creating > > > > connectors from the console. > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-727 > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1451 > > > > > > > > Actually, it's possible they have been applied without closing the > > > > JIRAs but I wasn't able to connect to svn.activemq.org to check. > > > > > > > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > Paul > > > > > > > > > > > > On 6/5/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hiram / James, > > > > > > > > > > Currently we are running off 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT. Can you release an official version? I'd like to get > > > > > the official G RC out tomorrow. > > > > > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > > > Hiram Chirino wrote: > > > > > > Howdy Folks, > > > > > > > > > > > > I was planing to work on a patch that takes that gbean related modules > > > > > > in ActiveMQ puts them in > > > > > > geronimo. I just wanted to make sure that there are no objections to > > > > > > this. Those gbean modules are mostly just gbean related glue code > > > > > > which I think make more sense living in Geronimo. No one else outside > > > > > > of the geronimo project is interested in the activemq gbean modules. > > > > > > > > > > > > Once that part is done, then I'll start to work on merging/modifying > > > > > > the port to activemq 4.x that was done the 1.2-dead branch. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Regards, > > > Hiram > > > > > > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
