I don't think this is quite ready for a vote yet, and I'm not convinced it requires a vote.

First, it really should include more of a description of what the purpose of the change is, such as:

"Due to bugs in the web app classloader in 1.0, the remote deploy war was split into 2 modules. Since that classloader bug has been resolved in 1.1 it's time to merge this stuff back into one module"

Second, when a patch moves a file, it should not be applied as a patch. The patch might be OK to look at, but we have to preserve svn history, so whoever is going to "apply the patch" needs to know the svn commands that resulted in the patch. Here we need something like


"Run these svn commands:
svn mv modules/remote-deploy-lib/src/java/......java modules/remote- deploy/src/java/....
...
svn rm modules/remote-deploy-lib
"
Other adjustments to make the build work again should be in a patch that does not include the effects of the svn commands.

Thirdly I don't think this patch fixes the m1 build.... unfortunately we can't throw it out yet.

The reason I don't think this requires a vote is that it does not change any java code and is part of the bug fix to the web app classloading. However I think since you proposed a vote and we haven't had much practice voting yet it would be a good idea to go through the vote process on this small uncontroversial change.

Many thanks
david jencks

On Jun 9, 2006, at 9:23 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:

Merged remote-deploy-lib with remote-deploy.
Migrated remote-deploy to M2.

http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2098

Reply via email to