Changing a released jar in the repository is a bad idea. There is no real down side to having some old releases with "incubator" in the name, and we when the project graduated we would just update the poms to their new name.

Anyway, as Alan pointed out, it most likely isn't worth the effort to move the code now.

-dain

On Jun 8, 2006, at 11:38 PM, John Sisson wrote:

Don't they have to have "incubator" as part of the file names and then when they exit the incubator they can remove "incubator" from the name. Sounds like it may create extra work changing Geronimo POMs to point to the correct files at different stages. Are the groupIDs changing too?

John

Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Projects in the incubator can do releases. They do have a restriction until the IP is cleared, but once that is done they can release using the normal release process.

-dain

On Jun 5, 2006, at 6:29 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:

I'm ok with it but would prefer to turn them over after Yoko graduates. My understanding is that an incubator project can't release anything. I expect they don't change a whole lot but that would be my only reservation.



Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I think that it's time that we, Yoko, take responsibility for the CORBA spec jars. After Geronimo releases v1.1, let's plan on moving them over to Yoko.
Thoughts?
Regards,
Alan



Reply via email to