On Jun 5, 2006, at 2:19 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
o.a.g.modules (formerly called configs) o.a.g.xxx (formerly called modules) o.a.g.plugins o.a.g.assemblies o.a.g.applications o.a.g.specs (has been in use for a while now)I think this is reasonable for the code-base as it exists now.
Coming in late on this thread.I don't like conceptual groupIds. I do like o.a.g for nearly everything (specs excluded). I do like groupId to at least match the package name.
-David
