On Jun 5, 2006, at 2:19 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:

o.a.g.modules (formerly called configs)
o.a.g.xxx (formerly called modules)
o.a.g.plugins
o.a.g.assemblies
o.a.g.applications
o.a.g.specs (has been in use for a while now)

I think this is reasonable for the code-base as it exists now.


Coming in late on this thread.

I don't like conceptual groupIds. I do like o.a.g for nearly everything (specs excluded). I do like groupId to at least match the package name.

-David

Reply via email to