Re: GBeans representing separately persistent data

[Alan D. Cabrera]

Jeff Genender wrote: Aaron Mulder wrote: On 6/11/06, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Following your analogy we would be making GBeans for individual EJB instances. What am I missing? I guess you're missing JSR-77, which seems to say that we should have GBeans for individual EJB instances. Servlets too. Which part of JSR-77 says we need GBeans for Servlets? I will be surprised of that spec even has the word "GBean" in it. I do believe the servlets have MBean access. Is this what you are referring to? I think that there is an important distinction here.  There's a difference between providing JMX access and what features deployment capabilities have.  For example, while I may have access to an individual instance of an entity bean, I'm not sure because, thank god, I do not know JSR-77, I am certain that one cannot *create* an instance of an entity bean using GBean.  One can only create its container. Regards, Alan