inline.. --- David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm finding it a bit hard to keep track of the m2 migration status, > so I thought I'd try to put it all on one page. > > RTC VOTES IN PROCESS: > deployment plugin: 2 votes out of 3 or 4 needed (me + gnodet), vote > pending since June 6 > remote-deploy-lib combine with remote-deploy: 2 votes out of 3 needed > > (me + aaron), vote pending since June 9 > settle on configIds for m2 build: 1 vote out of 3 needed: (dain), I > owe jsisson a patch. vote pending since June 5 > (I've been delaying a patch for the configId changes partly because > AFAICT the stuff that is affected by path length is not yet part of > the build. In any case the proposal only shortens paths: whether the > > result can be built on windows is another question) > > > Jira issues: > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2071 : "main" jira > entry: all applied except the deployment plugin, see vote above. > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1737 : assembly plugin: > > no patch. I understand our assembly plugin working requires some bug > > fixes in maven. > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1740: packaging plugin: > > IIUC the patches in this issue are superseded by newer ones in 2071, > > all of which have been applied. Anita, can you confirm this? If so, > > lets close this issue. Minor modifications will be made in packaging plugin to accommodate geronimo-plugin.xml and daytrader. I will close this one and attach any new patches to GERONIMO-2067. > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2066: openejb > migration. IIUC the patch in this issue is superseded by newer ones > > in 2071 which have been applied. Anita, can you confirm this? If so, > > lets close this issue. The tests need to be fixed. Either we can keep this issue open or open a new one with a new title. > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2067: configs > migration. All patches applied. not all configs are built with m2 > yet. Thnaks, for quick turnaround time for patches. This is still work in progress.. > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2082: stax dependencies > > are all wrong in xmlbeans pom and xmlbeans plugin. This is waiting > for the maven 2 team to resume uploads. > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2092: modules > migration: no patch. > > COVERAGE: > > Tranql needs an m2 build. The lack of a pom is causing lots of > warning messages. Transitive dependencies would be a help. > > Geronimo modules (are we going to call them jars now?): > All modules have a pom.xml except console-war which I believe to be > an early abandoned project. I suggest we delete it. > There are 2 modules that are not built although they have a pom: > service-builder and installer-support. Installer support is not > needed at least until someone starts working on the installer again. > > I don't understand how the build succeeds without service-builder. > I'm adding service builder back in. Thanks. A test in service-builder started failing recently (this week). It was disabled in my copy, and made it to the patch accidently. > > There are test failures in several modules, and results differ for > different people. For instance the tomcat tests fail for me but not > > anita or prasad. This is on my TODO list. > > Openejb: core, openejb-builder and pkgen-builder all build but the > tests are turned off. > > Applications: all applications are built with m2 > > configs: missing pom.xml are daytrader[jetty,tomcat], remote-deploy > [jetty,tomcat] and uddi [jetty,tomcat] > In addition, activemq, activemq-broker, console[jetty,tomcat] are not > > built > > assemblies: no assembly plugin, none built. > > I think we're getting moderately close to having a working m2 build. yes... Thanks Anita > > thanks > david jencks > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
