Please see comments inline -
On 6/11/06, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 7, 2006, at 1:03 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Attention Maven Committers !
I really wish we had a maven committer too involved with the m2
migration effort. There are atleast 3 maven JIRAs that we desperately
need. Hopefully, then you could empathize with our pain and help us
get those JIRAs resolved :-)
Here are some of them to begin with -
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-45 is needed to
"flatten"
dir structures during assembly.
Am I correct that this one has no patch? A patch would probably get applied
pretty quickly
There's no patch for this yet. But now that some of the other JIRAs
are getting loked into and the patches getting applied, it has
motivated me to work on this too. I'd be glad to work on it.
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-41 can help us
extract
*-builder-* artifacts for our schemas.
There's a patch on http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/M
ASSEMBLY-103
that appears to solve this problem, jvanzyl was starting to look at it.
Wonderful. Thanks Jason.
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MWAR-45 is needed to jar up
classes
into web-inf/lib/classes.jar
Jason has applied this patch and pushed a 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT to the
http://people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-war-plugin/2.0.1-SNAPSHOT/
Thanks again Jason.
I can't get it to download automatically, but I downloaded it by hand and it
seems to work. It looks like jspc is not yet turned on?
Jeff Genender was kind enough to apply my patches MJSPC-2 and MJSPC-3
to the jspc plugin. But I have not turned jspc on yet because the
1.5-SNAPSHOT of the jspc plugin was not on any repo as of Friday. I
have requested Jeff to place it on some repo after which we can turn
it on.
I modified the root pom.xml to enable this jar-in-war feature:
Index: pom.xml
===================================================================
--- pom.xml (revision 413472)
+++ pom.xml (working copy)
@@ -1200,7 +1200,10 @@
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-war-plugin</artifactId>
- <version>2.0</version>
+ <version>2.0.1-20060611.183352-1</version>
+ <configuration>
+
<archiveClasses>true</archiveClasses>
+ </configuration>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</pluginManagement>
(downloading didn't work any better with 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT)
thanks
david jencks
Cheers
Prasad.
On 6/6/06, anita kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have already linked GERONIMO-2066, GERONIMO-2067, and
GERONIMO-2082 to GERONIMO-2071. I am going to link GERONIMO-1740 also.
Yes, for any new work we can create subtasks.
Thnaks
Anita
--- Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/6/06, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Now that we have something like a baseline of M2 in the trunk, can
> we
> > please go back to creating subtasks under Geronimo-2071 for any
> > current work that we are doing. This will help us prevent
> duplication.
>
> Thanks Prasad! I thought it was me who could not follow what was
> being
> done and meant to propose exactly what you did.
>
> > Prasad
>
> Jacek
>
> --
> Jacek Laskowski
> http://www.laskowski.net.pl
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
