We have currently just 4 entries there, kinda skinny I know. As we deliver new releases this list
will follow along.
How could we organize the content in the geronimo space so we don't loose control (structure,
visibility, hierarchy, etc...)?
For instance, the space we have hosted at Atlassian. There we are limited by having a single space
so we get to play with just the hierarchy (we do have some issues with visibility, hierarchy and
structure)
If there is no separated space, would there be a top level page as a parent containing all the
general stuff? or the question is about having all the general info "consolidated" via one link to
the same space?
Moving from one space to another (from a user/contributor perspective) should be transparent. If we
change the name from Geronimo SandBox to "Geronimo General Information" for example, would that
still be confusing?
Could you elaborate more what would be confusing, not sure I follow. The last thing I wanted with
that structure was to make the things more confusing.
In addition, having a separated space provides extra benefits in terms of administration (do I need
to list? :) )
Cheers!
Hernan
David Blevins wrote:
On Jun 12, 2006, at 1:16 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
Yeah, SandBox was the most representative name I could come up with
at that time, not necessarily the best ;-)
I would prefer to keep the geronimo space as a the router to all our
content. In fact I created that space as a consequence of not being
able to create a TOC (consolidating all entries) outside confluence.
I'll be happy to migrate the SandBox space to any other name we may
want. However, I would say that if we use the geronimo space to add/
develop content we will end up loosing the organization we are trying
to achieve. I think we should have a separated space (SandBox), maybe
with a more appealing name, to hold "everything else". Thoughts?
I see your concerns and share them, but don't see how having a space
amounting to "uncategorized" eliminates disorganization. I just see it
being confusing as most people's first inclination will be to document
general Geronimo stuff that's not version specific in the GERONIMO space.
It's also pretty trivial to move documents.
-David
Cheers!
Hernan
David Blevins wrote:
Hi Hernan,
All looks pretty great. One comment below.
On Jun 7, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
The last section should hold "everything else", this section will
be a good place to put the historical and/or still valid data from
the old wiki that does not fit in any of the other spaces.
1. Apache Geronimo v1.0
Apache Geronimo v1.0 - User's Guide
Apache Geronimo v1.0 - Developer's Guide
2. Apache Geronimo v1.1
Apache Geronimo v1.1 - User's Guide
3. Apache Geronimo Project Management
Apache Geronimo Development Process
Apache Geronimo Development Status
4. Apache Geronimo SandBox
Not sure if this organization calls for a vote but is pretty close
to what we have been discussing from the beginning for organizing
the documentation.
Not a big fan of a SandBox space (GMOxSBOX) and would prefer just
use the GERONIMO space for "everything else."
-David
