As far as I know, the patch is valid, it just needs to be applied to a different module than it was created against. I'm not sure if we're waiting for this for the release or not. I had hoped it would go in. Hiram, do you want to look at it or do you want me to?
Thanks, Aaron On 6/12/06, John Sisson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I thought that we were waiting for http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1451 to be fixed. Aaron and Hiram do you know what is happening here? John Kevan Miller wrote: > My first response went to the user list. I'm repeating on dev... > > ActiveMQ 3.2.4 hasn't been released yet? I see we're still including > ActiveMQ 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT in our repository. What's the plan, there? > > I don't think we can release until ActiveMQ has released... Is there > some problem? > > --kevan > > On Jun 11, 2006, at 11:48 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: > >> Over the past few days the outstanding issues that were raised about >> the first candidate have been addressed. >> >> They were that we were missing the LICENSE.txt as well as Notices >> from the distribution. I added them. Guillaume also pointed out >> that he noted that there should be a Third Party Notices. This was >> not included in the original 1.0 or previous distributions so I did >> not follow it up. Thoughts? >> >> Also, the 1.0 release notes were removed and updated the thread >> started by Hernan. The Wiki has been updated and the wiki was the >> source used to create the RELEASE-NOTES-1.1.txt file you will find in >> the build. >> >> To avoid issues with the version number and the plugins I used rc1 >> which Aaron had added in the plugins for supported versions so I >> trust that works here. >> >> JSisson addressed the problem with not being able to run Geronimo >> under CygWin and Kevan worked with Aaron to address a new deployment >> problem that left partially deployed artifacts in the repository. >> >> I have taken this build and run some performance tests on it and we >> are significantly better in 1.1 than we were in 1.0. We have a lot >> of improvement left for CMP EJBs. It appears that the performance >> improvements in the EJB tier has changed a race condition when >> running under DB2. I'm afraid that the only way to address the >> problem is to add a new feature to TranQL and OEJB that allow for the >> specification of Isolation Levels for individual beans. This is a >> relatively simple change but the build as it stands is specification >> compliant. I would prefer to let this release go forward since CMP >> 2.1 EJBs are not nearly as common as the other J2EE components. I >> would like to address this in 1.1.1 however I don't think we've >> locked down whether that would be allowed or not. The change would >> affect TranQL and OpenEJB so they are really included components so >> I'd be interested in people's feedback. >> >> So please accept a named RC1. Your voting and feedback are for: >> >> Geronimo 1.1 >> DayTrader 1.1 >> Specs 1.1 >> >> The vote will stand for 72 hours. Issues raised will be discussed >> and if we conclude that there is a bug that must be addressed then we >> will mitigate the problem and respin a new rc for a 72 hour vote. >> >> If this is accepted all three of the above components will be >> released simultaneously. >> >> Here are the builds for your review and comment: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-jetty-j2ee-1.1-rc1.tar.gz >> >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-jetty-j2ee-1.1-rc1.zip >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-tomcat-j2ee-1.1-rc1.tar.gz >> >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-romcat-j2ee-1.1-rc1.zip >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-jetty-minimal-1.1-rc1.tar.gz >> >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-jetty-minimal-1.1-rc1.zip >> >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-tomcat-minimal-1.1-rc1.tar.gz >> >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-tomcat-minimal-1.1-rc1.zip >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/daytrader-ear-1.1-rc1.zip >> >> >> Looking forward to your comments and feedback. >> > >
