Aaron Mulder wrote:
OK, so I see David Blevins has now created branches/1.1.1. That still wasn't what I expected. I expect branches/1.1 to be the 1.1.x HEAD at all times. I don't expect us to continue to change it to branches/1.1.1 branches/1.1.2 branches/1.1.3 etc. That has the same disadvantages I originally noted, namely that if you have pending work in the branch that you decide not to check in until after a release then you're kind of screwed, and you have to re-check out the branch after every dot release, and so on. I'm thinking more likeHEAD----------------- `branches/1.1 `tags/1.1.0 `tags/1.1.1 `tags/1.1.2 `branches/1.2 `tags/1.2.0 `tags/1.2.1 `tags/1.2.2 `branches/1.3 ... `branches/2.0 `tags/2.0.0 `tags/2.0.1 `tags/2.0.2 ... Is that not what others are planning on? Does anyone mind if I move branches/1.1.1 back to branches/1.1?
Putting aside the discussion as to what goes into branches/1.x, this all makes sense to me.
Regards, Alan
