It will be too much of a pain move the project when the GShell rulz the
planet. I suggest that the code be GSHELL and that the Descriptive name
be GShell - Sandbox.
Regards,
Alan
John Sisson wrote:
+1 . How about having "sandbox" as part of the name of the Project or
Component so it is clear to users what the status of the project is.
John
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Well, who can argue with that line of reasoning. :)
Now that I think of it, if making a Jira project helps build a
community around it, let's do it. It will be trivial to drop the
project, as Dain has previously mentioned.
Regards,
Alan
Jason Dillon wrote:
GShell isn't gonna die... it will rule the world one day... its
already kicking much ass.
Unix geeks are gonna love us... :-]
--jason
On 6/9/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 9, 2006, at 9:35 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> Jason Dillon wrote:
>> Can we create a new JIRA project for GShell? I've got a bunch of
>> task/todo items that I would like to track in JIRA so it is easier
>> to prioritize and plan.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> --jason
>>
> IMO, if it gets out of the sandbox, it deserves a Jira project.
I seen no reason not to give it a JIRA. If it dies in the sandbox,
we can always delete the JIRA.
-dain
