David Blevins wrote:
On Jun 15, 2006, at 11:18 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
-0.5 to copying branches/1.1 to branches/1.1.x and then copying or
moving to tags/1.1.x Since ONLY BUG FIXES can possibly be added to
branches/1.1, this should not cause problems. The release manager
gets say over what goes into a release, they can revert changes they
don't want in the release. I think the copy to branches/1.1.x just
adds steps for no gain.
I would upgrade this to a -1 on my part.
Think you're getting kind of nit-picky on what you think is easiest
for a release manager to do. I'd rather see us simply agree on what
the end result should be.
IMHO, if a release manager wants to copy into a temp location while
they finalize the release (which can take days) to remove the risk of
having to roll back accidental changes, that's fine.
While I agree with your statements, I think that the point that DJ and I
were trying to make was that there is no need for a branches/1.1.x
branch as a temp location if no one is modifying branches/1.1. This is
the case if we only put bug fixes into 1.x branches.
Regards,
Alan
