+1 great idea Paul.
Paul McMahan wrote: > There's an interesting plugin site for eclipse at > eclipseplugincentral.com that implements some of the ideas we have > discussed. It provides a directory of plugins but not the actual > files themselves, pointing elsewhere for the purchase/download. It > also provides a rating system, news page, and discussion forums. IMHO > the geronimo project should strive to provide this type of site for > building a healthy commercial and open source community around > geronimo plugins. > > The domain names "geronimoplugincentral.com" and > "geronimoplugincentral.org" were available and match the form used by > "eclipseplugincentral.com" so I purchased them and would like to > donate them to the ASF. How can I do that? Just send a note to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Best wishes, > Paul > > > On 6/14/06, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Everyone, please read and ACK. >> >> On Jun 14, 2006, at 4:31 PM, John Sisson wrote: >> >> > Hiram, I care if a private or commercial entity has control over >> > the default option. >> >> I think Hiram does too, he just a read a little too fast. His >> thoughts are clear though. >> >> On Jun 14, 2006, at 3:55 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote: >> > All I'm saying is I don't care if IBM puts up >> > http://www.ibm.com/wasce/plugins, I also don't care if you put up a >> > http://virtuas.com/geronimo/plugins site. >> > >> > Now the default link issue is something else. Can we point it by >> > default at some Apache machines by default? I'm sure Aaron would not >> > mind, would you? >> >> That pretty much sums it up for me. Aaron seems to agree. In fact, >> is there anyone out there who doesn't agree? >> >> -David >> >>
