I think that removing the m1 files is a good idea, as it will help
force us to get m2 to build... which really should not take that long
to get functional 100% of the time.
--jason
On Jun 26, 2006, at 9:19 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 6/26/06, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm suggesting that we declare the m1 build obsolete and remove it,
except possibly for the assembly step and perhaps modules where the
tests do not run under m2.
Well, don't get it annoying, but I still don't understand it. Let's
pretend we've named the m1 build obsolete, what's next? Shall we call
a vote? If it passes, what would be the next steps? If you removed
the
top-level build.xml I'd know what it'd mean, but now I don't get it.
Yes, we call a vote then remove the project.xml/project.properties
files. build.xml is for Ant; I don't think we use that.
Regards,
Alan
