Nothing with the actual association itself. Die hard OpenEJB fans want
to use OpenEJB w/out the usual Geronimo accoutrements. As I mentioned
below, Dain is working on this.
Regards,
Alan
John Sisson wrote:
Alan,
What type of concerns do they have regarding its close association
with Geronimo?
Regards,
John
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I also am leaning towards the idea that it's good for OpenEJB to be
separate from Geronimo. Whenever I talk w/ users of OpenEJB, they
are always concerned about its close association w/ Geronimo.
However, it is my understanding that Dain is working hard on
decoupling OpenEJB's strong reliance on Geronimo code.
Regards,
Alan
Mohammed Nour wrote:
Hi All...
+1, but I have a question. Isn't it better to have OEJB as a
separate project, as we have the intention to make it independent
from Geronimo, as to have it work inside or outside Geronimo?
On 12/3/05, *David Blevins* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
The OpenEJB committers have discussed it and voted to be become a
Geronimo sub-project. The incubator proposl is here:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenEjbProposal
Please vote if you'd like Geronimo to be the sponsor of OpenEJB
during incubation
[ ] +1 = I support the move to sponsor OpenEJB during incubation
as a
sub-project of Geronimo
[ ] +0 = I don't mind either way
[ ] -1 = I don't support this move because: _______________
+1 from me
--
David
